The approach taken to the philosophy of social science has important consequences for developing
empirical concepts. The position taken to ontology (‘what exists?’), epistemology (‘how do we know
what exists’?), the similarities between the social and natural sciences, the role of structure and agents and the nature of causal relationships, all have important consequences for the theoretical
frameworks being constructed to understand a given problem.
Critical realism has grown to become established as an alternative approach to the social sciences to
mainstream positivism, rational choice theory and constructivism, in recent years. At its core, the
approach holds that social structures always pre-exist humans and agents – but that human agency is necessary for the reproduction of social structures and is capable of changing them over time.
The approach has been applied to re-understand a wide range of political problems and puzzles – see below!
What is critical realism?
This video is a great starting point.
A realist theory of democracy
- Toby S. James (2024) ‘Real Democracy: A Critical Realist Approach to Democracy and Democratic Theory‘ New Political Science.
A realist theory of voting and elections
- Toby S. James and Holly Ann Garnett (2023) ‘The Voter Experience Around the World: A Human Reflexivity Approach‘ Representation.
A realist theory of electoral management
- (2020) Comparative Electoral Management (Routledge: London and New York).
A realist theory of political leadership
- (2021) ‘ Assessing the Policy Effects of Political Leaders: a Layered Framework‘, Policy Studies, 42(5/6), p.437-454.
- (2021) ‘The effects of Donald Trump‘, Policy Studies, 42(5/6), p.755-69
- (2015) ‘Integrating Structural Context into the Assessment of Political Leadership: Realism, Gordon Brown and the Great Financial Crisis‘, Parliamentary Affairs, 68(1), 77-96, with Jim Buller (download pdf).
A realist theory of local policy chnage
- (2009) ‘What ever happened to Régulation Theory? The Régulation Approach and local government revisited’, Policy Studies, 30(2), p181-201.