Month: June 2013
Examples of errors and incompetence in the organisation of elections can now be readily found in many democracies around the world. Consider:
- In the UK 2010 general election, a number of polling stations run out of ballot papers or had queues which meant that citizens were unable to cast their vote.
- A recent report on the running of the Canadian elections showed that over 500 serious errors were made, on average, per electoral district in the 2011 federal elections. These were so serious that the election result was initially annulled by a judge.
- Reports from the Malaysian 2013 elections that officials were not shaking the bottles of indelible ink before marking voters fingers. The result was that some could wash off the ink and vote twice. (See the Video on the right)
What is going on? Surely running an election can’t be that difficult? After all, many democracies have been doing this for years without making such terrible errors.
- Greater legal complexity – a greater diversity and number of elections makes them harder to administer
- More actors involved in elections – devolution and the fragmentation of central government makes elections more difficult to co-ordinate
- Increased population movements – increased immigration and high levels of internal migration make the register difficult to compile.
- The rise of social media – errors are reported more quickly and loudly because of the rise of Twitter etc
Some of these changes may be specific to the UK, but most can be found in many established democracies. This means that concerns about electoral integrity are no longer the preserve of new and emerging democracies. They are likely to be found in the backyard of the established democracies that were once thought of as exemplars to the world for the practice of elections.
|Ballot papers from the 2010 British General election|